I don’t draw chickens much, and I certainly know very little about them. But any animal is material for a cartoonist’s muse–we can plug any idea into any situation. Roosters, from my perspective, are comical. All bravado, swagger, pomp. Does that sound like anyone–ahem–cough–cough, NEWT, cough–we know?
-
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- July 2017
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
Categories
When Do They Serve The Wine?About
Twitter Updates
- Chilling. Even more to see, it's so disturbing. "A Reporter’s Footage from Inside the Capitol Siege"… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 hours ago
- Phil Spector, lionized producer of 1960s pop and convicted murderer, dies at 81 washingtonpost.com/local/obituari… 6 hours ago
- The Hope Train link.medium.com/4uvyPF1H7cb 6 hours ago
-
Nice rooster! You managed to capture a certain roosterness. I love roosters. I collect them. (Not real ones: weathervanes, old prints, sculptures, etc.) Weird? Yes. But somebody has to do it. Roosters just do their natural rooster thing, and they are most definitely comical. But do they deserve to be compared to Newt-sters? I think not. You might be hearing from the Rooster Anti-Defamation League (RADL).
Thanks, Rob. Yeah, I didn’t actually think of the feelings of roosters, when perhaps I should have. My apologies to all you wonderful birds….you can’t help the way you are. Unlike some humans we know!